A OMISS\u00c3O NA DECLARA\u00c7\u00c3O DE INCONSTITUCIONALIDADE: An\u00e1lise do
\ndiscurso sobre o cabimento de embargos de declara\u00e7\u00e3o nas declara\u00e7\u00f5es de
\ninconstitucionalidade
\nOMISSION IN THE DECLARATION OF UNCONSTITUTIONALITY: speech
\nanalysis about the suitability of \u201cAmendment of Judgment\u201d in the declarations of
\nunconstitutionality<\/p>\n
\nEvandro Pereira Guimar\u00e3es Ferreira Gomes\u00b9<\/p>\n
RESUMO
\nO objeto do presente trabalho versa sobre a an\u00e1lise do discurso das decis\u00f5es dos ministros do
\nSupremo Tribunal Federal em embargos de declara\u00e7\u00e3o opostos contra a declara\u00e7\u00e3o de
\ninconstitucionalidade que deixou de apreciar a modula\u00e7\u00e3o temporal dos efeitos por falta de
\nrequerimento das partes. O estudo parte da seguinte pergunta: cabe embargos de declara\u00e7\u00e3o,
\nem sede de controle concreto, em face da n\u00e3o manifesta\u00e7\u00e3o da Corte Constitucional brasileira
\nsobre a modula\u00e7\u00e3o temporal dos efeitos nas declara\u00e7\u00f5es de inconstitucionalidade? Destaquese
\nque os embargos de declara\u00e7\u00e3o s\u00e3o o recurso opon\u00edvel \u00e0 decis\u00e3o que apresenta omiss\u00e3o,
\ncontrariedade ou obscuridade, ao passo que a declara\u00e7\u00e3o de inconstitucionalidade de norma
\nproduz efeitos pr\u00f3prios, declarando nulos os atos produzidos com base na referida norma em
\nraz\u00e3o do seu efeito ex tunc. Sendo assim, nossa hip\u00f3tese consiste na possibilidade de
\nprovimento na oposi\u00e7\u00e3o de embargos nas declara\u00e7\u00f5es de inconstitucionalidade quando n\u00e3o h\u00e1
\npedido nos autos acerca da modula\u00e7\u00e3o temporal dos efeitos, por ser esta mat\u00e9ria de \u00edndole
\nconstitucional. Por fim, a presente pesquisa utiliza a matriz te\u00f3rica de analise do discurso
\ndesenvolvida por Patrick Charaudeau.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
ABSTRACT
\nThe object of this paper talks about the speech analysis of judgments from Federal Supreme
\nCourt in the \u201cAmendment of Judgment\u201d directed against declaration of unconstitutionality
\nthat did not appreciated the temporal modulation of the effects due to the lack of requirement
\nby the litigant. The study begins on the question if is suitable the use of \u201cAmendment of
\nJudgment\u201d in thirst for concrete control opposite the absence of manifestation of Brazilian
\nConstitutional Court about the temporal modulation of the effects in the declarations of
\nunconstitutionality? it Should be highlighted that the \u201cAmendment of Judgment\u201d are relied
\non against a decision that shows an omission, contrariety or obscurity while the declaration of
\nunconstitutionality of a norm produces its own effects by declaring null and void the acts
\ndone based on that norm because of its ex tunc effect. Therefore, our hypothesis consists in
\nthe impossibility of be upheld \u201cAmendment of Judgment\u201d in the declaration of
\nunconstitutionality when there is no request in the proceedings about the temporal modulation
\nof the effects. Finally, this research uses the theoretical matrix of speech analysis developed
\nby Patrick Charaudeau.<\/p>\n
1 Autor\/Author
\nMestre em Direito P\u00fablico e Evolu\u00e7\u00e3o Social pela Universidade Est\u00e1cio de S\u00e1. Diretor Jur\u00eddico do Instituto
\npara o Avan\u00e7o Cientifico dos Pa\u00edses do Sul (The Institute for the Scientific Advancement of the South).
\nAdvogado.<\/p>\n